Ontological Damnation

And on and on? A question of continuity
and endurance? Will it become, what was
it before, to say this is was that not? And
on and on? It was this not is and has prop-
erties too? Why was is instead? Where along
is will it be was and is this really is? And
on and on? Until was there being why it is?
Forever they was is are becoming them to
us for is? Was is it was? And on and on?

Before it was is it was always is and begin-
ning was is beginning to question is instead?
Instead of intricate is for feeling was awar-
ded is and? And on and on? Is it never was
because? Because it is is was is it becomes
because is to arrange was? Alas is it? And
on and on? Also the it was always along for
it awaiting was never before? Beyond was go-
ingbecoming is always as is? And on and on?

To say it is without first was is to say it again?
“Would it be different with a different pen?”
And on and on? But is was going to be forever
as always is? And if is then was, a circular logic
belies? And on and on? A daring particular is go-
ing to shed light on was before it is all said and
was? Perhaps is going is simliar in form to was
from before even is to see? And on and on? May-
be instead we will just presume and on and on?

A tweet twat is an examination of the Twitter technocracy that attempts to unravel the very nature of my random 140-word missives. You can follow me at twitter for raw voltage. In theory, a new tweet twat will posted every Tuesday.